How persuasive is personalized advertising? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence of the effects of personalization on ad effectiveness

Tien Ee Dominic Yeo*, Tsz Hang Chu, Qiqi Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of personalized advertising, particularly on social media, to enhance brand awareness and engagement through highly targeted campaigns, extant literature suggests that personalization can produce both positive and negative persuasion outcomes. This meta-analytic review of 53 experimental studies addresses this personalization paradox by examining the persuasiveness of personalized advertising. The results indicated that personalized advertising is generally more effective than generic, non-personalized advertising in influencing overall persuasion, consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions. Consistent with congruity and self-referencing theories, meta-analytic structural equation modeling finds that perceived relevance—but not perceived intrusiveness—explained the persuasiveness of personalized advertising.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Advertising Research
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Apr 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Personalized advertising
  • online behavioral advertising
  • personalization paradox
  • congruity theory
  • self-referencing theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How persuasive is personalized advertising? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence of the effects of personalization on ad effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this