TY - JOUR
T1 - How Nation Building Backfires
T2 - Beliefs about Group Malleability and Anti-Chinese Attitudes in Hong Kong
AU - Lee, Siu Yau
AU - Chou, Kee Lee
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Kwan-nok Chan, Ying-yi Hong, Ching-kwan Lee, Brian Leung, Sarah Liu, Mark R. Thompson, Ngok Ma, Kate Yu, Samson Yuen, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and Fung-yee Choi, Bess Lam, Nick Or, Dong Yang, and Yolanda Yu for research support. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Siu-yau Lee, Department of Asian and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, NT, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 International Society of Political Psychology
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - An intriguing phenomenon documented within political science research is the association between nation-building programs and increased subnational intergroup conflicts. Based on data collected in Hong Kong, an epicenter of subnational conflicts in China, this article suggests that nation building may intensify the tension between subnational groups because it helps to spread the belief that groups have fixed inherent characteristics. Specifically, in the face of deep intergroup cultural and political differences, people who see their nation as a historically unified entity are more likely to believe that those differences are unchangeable and, in turn, develop negative attitudes toward other subnational groups. We support these arguments with a representative survey of the population and two laboratory experiments. In the first experiment, respondents who are exposed to narratives that emphasize the homogeneity of the Chinese nation report a higher level of fixed group perceptions than those who receive the opposite message. In the second experiment, respondents who are primed to believe that group characteristics are fixed report significantly more negative attitudes toward migrants from other parts of China. Our findings contribute conceptually to the study of nation building and shed new light on the formation of immigration attitudes.
AB - An intriguing phenomenon documented within political science research is the association between nation-building programs and increased subnational intergroup conflicts. Based on data collected in Hong Kong, an epicenter of subnational conflicts in China, this article suggests that nation building may intensify the tension between subnational groups because it helps to spread the belief that groups have fixed inherent characteristics. Specifically, in the face of deep intergroup cultural and political differences, people who see their nation as a historically unified entity are more likely to believe that those differences are unchangeable and, in turn, develop negative attitudes toward other subnational groups. We support these arguments with a representative survey of the population and two laboratory experiments. In the first experiment, respondents who are exposed to narratives that emphasize the homogeneity of the Chinese nation report a higher level of fixed group perceptions than those who receive the opposite message. In the second experiment, respondents who are primed to believe that group characteristics are fixed report significantly more negative attitudes toward migrants from other parts of China. Our findings contribute conceptually to the study of nation building and shed new light on the formation of immigration attitudes.
KW - China
KW - group malleability
KW - Hong Kong
KW - immigration attitudes
KW - implicit beliefs
KW - nation building
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079887860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pops.12657
DO - 10.1111/pops.12657
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85079887860
SN - 0162-895X
VL - 41
SP - 923
EP - 944
JO - Political Psychology
JF - Political Psychology
IS - 5
ER -