How event endstates are conceptualized in adults and infants

Angela Xiaoxue HE, Sudha Arunachalam

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference posterpeer-review

Abstract

Many event descriptions are true only when the event comes to its natural end point: e.g., a “feeding” event culmi- nates when the feed-ee has eaten, not simply when food is provided. Do non-linguistic event conceptualizations reflect attention to natural culmination points? We tested adults and 14-month-olds to ask: provided two events with the same ACTION but different ENDPOINTs - one a naturally expected result, the other only partially achieved - do adults and infants perceive them as members of the same event category or of different categories? Adults were asked to rate the similarity between the two events; infants were habituated to one event and tested for dishabituation when it was switched to the other. Adult data suggest the difference between a complete and a partially-complete event is registered, and carries more psychological weight than a mere perceptual difference. Infant data (ongoing) will show the developmental origin of such conceptualizations.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2016
Event38th Annual Meeting of Cognitive Science Society: Recognizing and Representing Events - Philadelphia, United States
Duration: 10 Aug 201613 Aug 2016
https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cogsci2016_proceedings.pdf (Conference proceedings)

Conference

Conference38th Annual Meeting of Cognitive Science Society
Abbreviated titleCOGSCI 2016
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPhiladelphia
Period10/08/1613/08/16
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How event endstates are conceptualized in adults and infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this