How efficient is naive portfolio diversification? An educational note

Gordon Y N TANG*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standard textbooks of Investment/Financial Management teach that although portfolio diversification can help reduce investment risk without sacrificing the expected rate of return, the benefit of diversification is exhausted with a portfolio size of 10-15. Since by then, most of the diversifiable risk is eliminated, leaving only the portion of systematic risk. How valid is this "common" knowledge? What is the exact value of "most" in the above statement? This paper examines the issue on naive (equal weight) diversification and analytically shows that for an infinite population of stocks, a portfolio size of 20 is required to eliminate 95% of the diversifiable risk on average. However, an addition of 80 stocks (i.e., a size of 100) is required to eliminate an extra 4% (i.e., 99% total) of diversifiable risk. This result depends neither on the investment horizons, sampling periods nor the markets involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-160
Number of pages6
JournalOmega
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2004

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems and Management

User-Defined Keywords

  • Diversifiable risks
  • Efficiency
  • Naive diversification
  • Portfolio

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How efficient is naive portfolio diversification? An educational note'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this