Abstract
Mechanisms to control Hong Kong’s young workers are embedded in inadequate labour protections within the government’s social welfare system and in prevalent informalization workplace practices. This article maintains that these control mechanisms have their origins in Hong Kong’s colonial era. Following Harvey, we argue that these control mechanisms are expressions of contradictions of capital in production and reproduction spheres. We identify the foundational and moving contradictions of capital expressed in Hong Kong’s lack of social welfare and employment protections, commodification of education, speculation in the housing market, patterns of work casualization and technology-induced labour-saving strategies, leading to precarity and everyday distress among young workers. New control mechanisms and contradictions of capital notwithstanding, this article highlights experiments to create spaces of resistance by Hong Kong’s young working classes in the hope of resisting the increasing degradation of their everyday living standards.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1123-1139 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Critical Sociology |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 7-8 |
Early online date | 2 Jun 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2022 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
User-Defined Keywords
- contradictions of capital
- Hong Kong
- precarious young worker
- spatial–temporal fixes
- state