TY - JOUR
T1 - High-Learners Present Larger Mid-Frontal Theta Power and Connectivity in Response to Incorrect Performance Feedback
AU - Luft, Caroline Di Bernardi
AU - Nolte, Guido
AU - Bhattacharya, Joydeep
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 the authors.
Funding Information:
C.D.B.L. was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (PDEE program, process number: 1428-10-1) to perform the experiment at Goldsmiths, University of London. This work received partial funding by the ESRC (EP/H01294X/1) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG:SFB936). We are thankful to Job Lindsen for his help with the data analysis and to Dr. Stuart Derbyshire for proofreading the paper.
PY - 2013/1/30
Y1 - 2013/1/30
N2 - A crucial aspect of cognitive control and learning is the ability to
integrate feedback, that is, to evaluate action outcomes and their
deviations from the intended goals and to adjust behavior accordingly.
However, how high-learners differ from low-learners in relation to
feedback processing has not been characterized. Further, little is known
about the underlying brain connectivity patterns during feedback
processing. This study aimed to fill these gaps by analyzing electrical
brain responses from healthy adult human participants while they
performed a time estimation task with correct and incorrect feedback. As
compared with low-learners, high-learners presented larger mid-frontal
theta (4–8 Hz) oscillations and lower sensorimotor beta (17–24 Hz)
oscillations in response to incorrect feedback. Further, high-learners
showed larger theta connectivity from left central, associated with
motor activity, to mid-frontal, associated with performance monitoring,
immediately after feedback (0–0.3 s), followed by (from 0.3 to 0.6 s
after feedback) a flux from mid-frontal to prefrontal, associated with
executive functioning. We suggest that these results reflect two
cognitive processes related to successful feedback processing: first,
the obtained feedback is compared with the expected one, and second, the
feedback history is updated based on this information. Our results also
indicate that high- and low-learners differ not only on how they react
to incorrect feedback, but also in relation to how their distant brain
areas interact while processing both correct and incorrect feedback.
This study demonstrates the neural underpinnings of individual
differences in goal-directed adaptive behavior.
AB - A crucial aspect of cognitive control and learning is the ability to
integrate feedback, that is, to evaluate action outcomes and their
deviations from the intended goals and to adjust behavior accordingly.
However, how high-learners differ from low-learners in relation to
feedback processing has not been characterized. Further, little is known
about the underlying brain connectivity patterns during feedback
processing. This study aimed to fill these gaps by analyzing electrical
brain responses from healthy adult human participants while they
performed a time estimation task with correct and incorrect feedback. As
compared with low-learners, high-learners presented larger mid-frontal
theta (4–8 Hz) oscillations and lower sensorimotor beta (17–24 Hz)
oscillations in response to incorrect feedback. Further, high-learners
showed larger theta connectivity from left central, associated with
motor activity, to mid-frontal, associated with performance monitoring,
immediately after feedback (0–0.3 s), followed by (from 0.3 to 0.6 s
after feedback) a flux from mid-frontal to prefrontal, associated with
executive functioning. We suggest that these results reflect two
cognitive processes related to successful feedback processing: first,
the obtained feedback is compared with the expected one, and second, the
feedback history is updated based on this information. Our results also
indicate that high- and low-learners differ not only on how they react
to incorrect feedback, but also in relation to how their distant brain
areas interact while processing both correct and incorrect feedback.
This study demonstrates the neural underpinnings of individual
differences in goal-directed adaptive behavior.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873025775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23365240
AN - SCOPUS:84873025775
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 33
SP - 2029
EP - 2038
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 5
ER -