TY - JOUR
T1 - Heritage tours and trails on foot in Hong Kong
T2 - towards a typology that crosses the tourist-local divide
AU - Barber, Lachlan B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Hong Kong Baptist University Faculty Research Grant [FRG2/15-16/086].
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Hong Kong Baptist University Faculty Research Grant [FRG2/15-16/086]. April Pun provided map-making assistance and the comments of Yu Ting-Fai and two anonymous reviewers helped to strengthen and refine the argument. Interviewees generously shared their time and knowledge.
PY - 2019/7/4
Y1 - 2019/7/4
N2 - Hong Kong's retrocession to Chinese sovereignty in 1997 initiated intense interest in cultural heritage on the part of divergently positioned actors, including activists, the state, and entrepreneurs. Heritage walking tours have proliferated, providing a wide range of examples suitable for comparison. This article develops a typology of heritage trails and tours in order to consider how they are situated in relation to the tourist economy and local context. Theoretically it builds on insights in new walking studies and debates in tourism and heritage studies on the ‘tourist-local divide.’ The article relies on qualitative research conducted in Hong Kong, including participant observation and interviews, and a review of various secondary sources. The typology distinguishes between government-generated, market-oriented, and community-based heritage walks. Three key issues are discussed: the ways that tours and trails develop, how they engage with official and unofficial heritage places, and how they reference urban issues including state-led urban renewal and redevelopment. The article argues that, while walking in general is a format that is suited to both tourist and local visitor engagement, some trails and tours reinforce dominant narratives of heritage and urban space, while others challenge them.
AB - Hong Kong's retrocession to Chinese sovereignty in 1997 initiated intense interest in cultural heritage on the part of divergently positioned actors, including activists, the state, and entrepreneurs. Heritage walking tours have proliferated, providing a wide range of examples suitable for comparison. This article develops a typology of heritage trails and tours in order to consider how they are situated in relation to the tourist economy and local context. Theoretically it builds on insights in new walking studies and debates in tourism and heritage studies on the ‘tourist-local divide.’ The article relies on qualitative research conducted in Hong Kong, including participant observation and interviews, and a review of various secondary sources. The typology distinguishes between government-generated, market-oriented, and community-based heritage walks. Three key issues are discussed: the ways that tours and trails develop, how they engage with official and unofficial heritage places, and how they reference urban issues including state-led urban renewal and redevelopment. The article argues that, while walking in general is a format that is suited to both tourist and local visitor engagement, some trails and tours reinforce dominant narratives of heritage and urban space, while others challenge them.
KW - cultural tourism
KW - Hong Kong
KW - mobilities
KW - Urban heritage
KW - walking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052322608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1743873X.2018.1510937
DO - 10.1080/1743873X.2018.1510937
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85052322608
SN - 1743-873X
VL - 14
SP - 295
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Heritage Tourism
JF - Journal of Heritage Tourism
IS - 4
ER -