HENRY V AND THE INVASION OF FRANCE: RETHINKING THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION

Clayton G.  MacKenzie

HENRY V AND THE INVASION OF FRANCE: RETHINKING THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION

Clayton G. MacKenzie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This comments appositely on the ethical issues raised by the Archbishop of Canterbury's much discussed discourse on the legality of Henry's claim to France (I.ii.33-95).2 A canon of critical review has evaluated Canterbury's exposition, with declamatory suggestions ranging from the assertion that it is mere double talk to the claim that it succeeds only in proving that Henry is not the rightful king of England.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	65-70
Number of pages	6
Journal	The Upstart Crow
Volume	25
Publication status	Published - 2005

Access to Document

https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/henry-v-invasion-france-rethinking-moral/docview/194678801/se-2?accountid=11440

Cite this

@article{be54d150f7544734a65b39001bcbd2ae,

title = "HENRY V AND THE INVASION OF FRANCE: RETHINKING THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION",

abstract = "This comments appositely on the ethical issues raised by the Archbishop of Canterbury's much discussed discourse on the legality of Henry's claim to France (I.ii.33-95).2 A canon of critical review has evaluated Canterbury's exposition, with declamatory suggestions ranging from the assertion that it is mere double talk to the claim that it succeeds only in proving that Henry is not the rightful king of England. ",

author = "MacKenzie, {Clayton G. }",

note = "Publisher copyright: Copyright Clemson University, Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing 2005",

year = "2005",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "65--70",

journal = "The Upstart Crow",

issn = "0886-2168",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - HENRY V AND THE INVASION OF FRANCE: RETHINKING THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION

AU - MacKenzie, Clayton G.

N1 - Publisher copyright: Copyright Clemson University, Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing 2005

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This comments appositely on the ethical issues raised by the Archbishop of Canterbury's much discussed discourse on the legality of Henry's claim to France (I.ii.33-95).2 A canon of critical review has evaluated Canterbury's exposition, with declamatory suggestions ranging from the assertion that it is mere double talk to the claim that it succeeds only in proving that Henry is not the rightful king of England.

AB - This comments appositely on the ethical issues raised by the Archbishop of Canterbury's much discussed discourse on the legality of Henry's claim to France (I.ii.33-95).2 A canon of critical review has evaluated Canterbury's exposition, with declamatory suggestions ranging from the assertion that it is mere double talk to the claim that it succeeds only in proving that Henry is not the rightful king of England.

M3 - Article

SN - 0886-2168

VL - 25

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - The Upstart Crow

JF - The Upstart Crow

ER -

HENRY V AND THE INVASION OF FRANCE: RETHINKING THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this