TY - JOUR
T1 - Hegemony and the politics of education in Hong Kong
T2 - from the post-war era to the post-handover era
AU - Lau, Tracy Chui Shan
N1 - Funding Information:
The tone of communications between the Hong Kong Government and the ROC Government was rather polite and formal, and some attempts at cooperation were made from time to time. After the ROC relocated to Taiwan, it dispatched officials and allocated resources to colonial Hong Kong to handle matters related to overseas Chinese in relation to education, economics, culture, media, party affairs, residents’ welfare and intellectual agency. Factional organisations were established with some financial support from the Kuomingtang Government (Lu and Zhao 1939). The establishment and running of these organisations reflected the political strategies of the ROC state and served as part of their unification agenda. As early as 1928, the Chinese Ministry of Education of the ROC asked all overseas Chinese schools (including those in Hong Kong) to register with a specially-designated bureau and to use a designated curriculum and textbooks. Since many local Chinese students proceeded to China for higher education studies, most large Chinese schools registered with the ROC Government on the Mainland. All registered Chinese schools followed the regulations of the ROC, and adopted a 6+3+3 system to parallel that in Mainland China at the time. Details of the school curriculum and textbooks were also required for registration (Tang and Bray 2000). Most of these Chinese schools supported the Chinese Nationalist movement. In 1929, physical education was introduced in these schools following the suggestion of the Nationalist Government. The ROC nationalist narrative and a sense of being Chinese patriots were promoted in these schools.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by The Lord Wilson Heritage Trust.
PY - 2018/10/2
Y1 - 2018/10/2
N2 - The process of Chinese nation-building in education reveals the hegemonic strategies of the colonial power and the adaptation of indigenous forces when Hong Kong was undergoing decolonisation and the transfer of sovereignty. The return of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty has been a crucial indicator for the potential re-unification of China, as it presents a model for the possible future reintegration of Taiwan. The idea of hegemony applies to different dominant groups in the two periods under review. In the first period, London attempted to influence the development of groups in Hong Kong and incorporate them into the colonial programme. In the second period, Beijing attempts to influence groups in Hong Kong facilitate the reintegration of Hong Kong into a larger Chinese identity. Yet, it is far too simple to picture a unilateral exercise of power by an identifiable centre and consider the periphery as mere objects of successful manipulation by the centre. Continued study of the evolution of nation-building in education, under the influence of a series of complex and shifting factors of the Hong Kong society, will be enlightening for the comprehension of the ever-changing and increasingly complicated political culture.
AB - The process of Chinese nation-building in education reveals the hegemonic strategies of the colonial power and the adaptation of indigenous forces when Hong Kong was undergoing decolonisation and the transfer of sovereignty. The return of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty has been a crucial indicator for the potential re-unification of China, as it presents a model for the possible future reintegration of Taiwan. The idea of hegemony applies to different dominant groups in the two periods under review. In the first period, London attempted to influence the development of groups in Hong Kong and incorporate them into the colonial programme. In the second period, Beijing attempts to influence groups in Hong Kong facilitate the reintegration of Hong Kong into a larger Chinese identity. Yet, it is far too simple to picture a unilateral exercise of power by an identifiable centre and consider the periphery as mere objects of successful manipulation by the centre. Continued study of the evolution of nation-building in education, under the influence of a series of complex and shifting factors of the Hong Kong society, will be enlightening for the comprehension of the ever-changing and increasingly complicated political culture.
KW - Chinese State and education
KW - colonial power
KW - hegemony and education
KW - History of education
KW - Hong Kong studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043304295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00220620.2018.1448764
DO - 10.1080/00220620.2018.1448764
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85043304295
SN - 0022-0620
VL - 50
SP - 241
EP - 255
JO - Journal of educational administration and history
JF - Journal of educational administration and history
IS - 4
ER -