Hegel's criticism of Laozi and its implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay looks at the fundamental differences between Chinese and Western philosophy as reflected in Hegel's famous criticism of Laozi. In his Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Hegel argues that Laozi's thought remains at the beginning stage of philosophy because it cannot move away from the abstract to derive "a kingdom of determination" to explain the multitude in the world. This essay investigates the reason for Hegel's criticism by critically examining the meaning of "determination" (Bestimmung) in his philosophical system with reference to his other writings, like The Science of Logic, and argues that Hegel is very much in the Socratic tradition of Western philosophy, in which definition and determination are the keys to knowledge. It then turns to examine Laozi's approach of knowing the miao of heaven and earth "without desire", and argues that Laozi is putting forward a method of knowing by letting the meaning of things appear by themselves "without doing anything," a contrast to Hegel's approach of conceptual determination. Finally, it examines Laozi's view on yu in contrast to Hegel's "desire" (Begierde), and concludes that Hegel's low estimation of Laozi is rooted in his own developmental view of philosophy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-79
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy East and West
Volume61
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hegel's criticism of Laozi and its implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this