Habits of reasoning: On the grammar and critics of logical habits

Ahti Veikko Pietarinen*, Francesco Bellucci

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We explain the grammar and the critics of the habits of reasoning, using Peirce’s 1903 Lowell Lectures and the related Syllabus as the key textual source. We establish what Peirce took sound reasoning to be, and derive a major soundness result concerning his logic as semeiotic: an argument is valid if for any object that the premises represent, the conclusion represents it as well, which in semeiotic terms translates to a sign being a valid argument if for any object that the sign represents, the interpretant sign represents it as well. The perfect adherence of the grammar to the critics is evidenced by the un-eliminability of leading principles. Just as a logical leading principle is an un-eliminable element of reasoning, because any attempt to use it as a premise engenders an infinite regress, so a logical representative interpretant is a habit that cannot be rendered a sign. The logical representative interpretant is a principle not itself a premise, a rule not itself subject to rules, a habit not itself a sign.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationConsensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit
    Subtitle of host publicationBefore and Beyond Consciousness
    EditorsDonna E. West, Myrdene Anderson
    PublisherSpringer Cham
    Chapter15
    Pages265-282
    Number of pages18
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Electronic)9783319459202
    ISBN (Print)9783319459189, 9783319833996
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Sept 2016

    Publication series

    NameStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
    Volume31
    ISSN (Print)2192-6255
    ISSN (Electronic)2192-6263

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Philosophy

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Interpretant
    • Justification of deduction
    • Leading principle
    • Logical critics
    • Reasoning
    • Semeiotic
    • Sign
    • Speculative grammar

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Habits of reasoning: On the grammar and critics of logical habits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this