Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Hong Kong Baptist University Home
Help & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Hong Kong Baptist University
Home
Scholars
Departments / Units
Research Output
Projects / Grants
Prizes / Awards
Activities
Student theses
Datasets
Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Academy of Chinese, History, Religion and Philosophy
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Journal article
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by:
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Artificial Intelligence
100%
Game Theory
100%
Intelligence Computation
100%
Explanatory Mechanisms
100%
Game Analysis
100%
Conceptual Analysis
100%
Cognitive Science
100%
Formal Tools
100%
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
100%
Conceptual Analysis
100%
Scientific Inquiry
100%
Cognitive Science
100%
Psychology
Artificial Intelligence
100%
Game Theory
100%
Cognitive Science
100%
Mathematics
Mathematics
100%
Scientific Inquiry
100%
Conceptual Analysis
100%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Artificial Intelligence
100%