Functional MRI evidence for reorganization of language networks

Ran LI, Nishaat Mukadam, Swathi Kiran*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this chapter, we review fMRI evidence for language reorganization in individuals with poststroke aphasia. Several studies in the current literature have utilized fMRI as a tool to understand patterns of functional reorganization in poststroke aphasia. Consistent with previous models that have been proposed to explain the trajectory of language recovery, differential patterns of language processing and language recovery have been identified across individuals with poststroke aphasia in different stages of recovery. Overall, a global network breakdown typically occurs in the early stages of aphasia recovery, followed by normalization in “traditional” left hemisphere language networks. Depending on individual characteristics, right hemisphere regions and bilateral domain-general regions may be further recruited. The main takeaway of this chapter is that poststroke aphasia recovery does not depend on individual neural regions, but rather involves a complex interaction among regions in larger networks. Many of the unresolved issues and contrastive findings in the literature warrant further research with larger groups of participants and standard protocols of fMRI implementation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook of Clinical Neurology
    EditorsArgye Elizabeth Hillis, Julius Fridriksson
    Place of PublicationNetherlands
    PublisherElsevier
    Chapter9
    Pages131-150
    Number of pages20
    Volume185
    ISBN (Print)9780128233849
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2022

    Publication series

    NameHandbook of Clinical Neurology
    PublisherElsevier
    ISSN (Print)0072-9752

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Functional MRI evidence for reorganization of language networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this