From Pride and Prejudice to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Recognition or Radicalization

Magdalen Ki*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Comparative poverty is a central issue in the world of Jane Austen. In Pride and Prejudice, the greater gentry displays a wide range of passive aggressive behaviors to keep the lesser gentry at bay. Austen intends that the micropolitics of reserve can be replaced by the politics of redistribution and recognition, leading to better relationships between the self and the other. Austen adaptations largely adhere to this integrationist vision, the only exception being Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, for Grahame-Smith’s novel and Burr Steers’s film openly foreground the irreconcilable differences between the sadomasochistic gentry class and the anarchistic underclass. As the heritage film genre is updated to reflect the contemporary world order, the cinema of reverence and nostalgic catharsis gives way to the cinema of irreverence and visionary paranoia, foregrounding the anti-heritage agenda and the conspiratorial outlook in Hollywood film culture.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4–23
    Number of pages20
    JournalPacific Coast Philology
    Volume57
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From Pride and Prejudice to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Recognition or Radicalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this