From culture 2.0 to a network state of mind: A selective history of web 2.0's Axiologies and a lesson from it

Pak Hang Wong*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


There is never a shortage of celebratory and condemnatory popular discourse on digital media even in its early days. This, of course, is also true of the advent of Web 2.0. In this article, I shall argue that normative analyses of digital media should not take lightly the popular discourse, as it can deepen our understanding of the normative and axiological foundation(s) of our judgements towards digital media. Looking at some of the most representative examples available, I examine the latest wave of popular discourse on digital media, focusing on the (new) worries and doubts voiced by the alarmists and the (new) hopes and dreams portrayed by the enthusiasts. I shall illustrate that various stances in the popular discourse on Web 2.0 are ultimately rested on different notions of the self. This conclusion entails an important lesson for our practice of critiques of digital media, as it entails that our critiques of digital media cannot be done without referring to a notion of the self. Hence, a normative enquiry of digital media should not only be about the moral and/or prudential goodness or badness per se; it should be about who we should be online, or which notion(s) of the self we should strive for.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-206
Number of pages16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2013

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Computer Science Applications

User-Defined Keywords

  • Andrew keen
  • Axiology
  • Charles ess
  • Clay shirky
  • Digital media
  • Good life
  • Information ethics
  • Jaron lanier
  • Nicholas carr
  • Nick bilton
  • Popular discourse
  • Self
  • Sherry turkle
  • Web 2.0


Dive into the research topics of 'From culture 2.0 to a network state of mind: A selective history of web 2.0's Axiologies and a lesson from it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this