From Academic Text to Talk-Show: Deepening Engagement and Understanding with Google NotebookLM

Marie Alina Yeo, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Yuwei Wan

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper looks at Google's NotebookLM, an AI-powered research assistant tool that can represent dense academic content in a range of output modes, like FAQs, timelines, study guides, and, most uniquely, as "Deep Dive" discussions. The discussions mimic a talk-show, where two AI-hosts unpack complex ideas from reading or audio texts, for example, a journal article or lecture, connecting them with related ideas. The talk-show format provides a relaxed, low-pressure way for learners to grasp key concepts. NotebookLM is especially helpful for those who may find academic reading overwhelming, as it transforms the reading process into a more enjoyable, multimodal experience. The paper describes and evaluates the discussion generation function in relation to principles of second language and digital learning. Overall, NotebookLM shows promise in helping learners to understand and engage with academic content more deeply and may be especially valuable for second language learners in English Medium Instruction (EMI) or bilingual education contexts which emphasize content development alongside language learning. However, the tendency of the AI-hosts to extract, embellish and augment the content may lead to misrepresentation of the original source text, raising epistemological concerns about the spread of misinformation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTESL-EJ
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Feb 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • AI research tool
  • AI-generated podcast
  • AI-powered research assistant
  • deep-dive discussions
  • multimodal research tool
  • NotebookLM
  • research management tool

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Academic Text to Talk-Show: Deepening Engagement and Understanding with Google NotebookLM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this