Freedom is not free: Manager disloyalty and bank debt reliance

Luofan Bu, Jeffrey Ng, Byron Y. Song, Mark Yuzhi Yan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditionally, fiduciaries' duty of loyalty requires them not to pursue business opportunities that could benefit their own companies. However, starting with Delaware in 2000, several states began allowing companies to waive this duty. We find that the debt structure of firms in waiver-adopting states shifts from public debt to bank debt, suggesting that these firms rely on more intense bank monitoring to address potential managerial disloyalty. The shift is more pronounced for firms with CEOs who are more likely to appropriate business opportunities and less pronounced for firms with stronger shareholder monitoring. We also find that bank debt mitigates the adverse effect of corporate opportunity waivers on shareholder wealth, the stock market reacts positively to the bank debt issuances of firms affected by these waivers, and corporate opportunity waiver laws increase the total debt market funding costs for affected firms. Collectively, our paper provides novel evidence that firms seek creditor governance to mitigate the loss of internal governance resulting from changes in the legal environment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102914
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume96
Early online date24 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Oct 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Corporate opportunity waivers
  • Debt structure
  • Fiduciary duty
  • Loan contracting
  • Monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Freedom is not free: Manager disloyalty and bank debt reliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this