Abstract
Traditionally, fiduciaries' duty of loyalty requires them not to pursue business opportunities that could benefit their own companies. However, starting with Delaware in 2000, several states began allowing companies to waive this duty. We find that the debt structure of firms in waiver-adopting states shifts from public debt to bank debt, suggesting that these firms rely on more intense bank monitoring to address potential managerial disloyalty. The shift is more pronounced for firms with CEOs who are more likely to appropriate business opportunities and less pronounced for firms with stronger shareholder monitoring. We also find that bank debt mitigates the adverse effect of corporate opportunity waivers on shareholder wealth, the stock market reacts positively to the bank debt issuances of firms affected by these waivers, and corporate opportunity waiver laws increase the total debt market funding costs for affected firms. Collectively, our paper provides novel evidence that firms seek creditor governance to mitigate the loss of internal governance resulting from changes in the legal environment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102914 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Corporate Finance |
| Volume | 96 |
| Early online date | 24 Oct 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
User-Defined Keywords
- Corporate opportunity waivers
- Debt structure
- Fiduciary duty
- Loan contracting
- Monitoring
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Freedom is not free: Manager disloyalty and bank debt reliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver