Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Founder-CEOS’ procedural fairness: How and when it matters to new venture ambidexterity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Different from the typical research about procedural fairness that focuses on lower level leaders and its influence on non-managerial teams, we pay particular attention to founder-CEOs’ procedural fairness. To investigate whether and how founder-CEOs’ procedural fairness could help to promote new ventures’ competitiveness, we first link this leadership quality to new ventures’ ambidexterity and propose new venture team members’ advice-seeking behavior as a mediator. We next predict that this indirect benefit is moderated by environmental dynamism, since the association between founder-CEOs’ procedural fairness and new venture teams’ advice-seeking behavior can be lessened when environmental dynamism is not high. Results based on a multi-sourced and time-lagged survey of founder-CEOs and all new venture team members in 92 Chinese new ventures support our predictions. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of General Management
Volume51
Issue number1
Early online date15 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

User-Defined Keywords

  • founder-CEOs
  • procedural fairness
  • advice seeking
  • ambidexterity
  • environmental dynamism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Founder-CEOS’ procedural fairness: How and when it matters to new venture ambidexterity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this