FAIR Metrics for Motivating Excellence in Peer Review

Adam Craig*, Carl Taswell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference proceedingpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Past attempts to measure the quality of peer review have relied on either subjective ratings or tangentially related factors such as the sheer number or length of reviews. Previously, we introduced the Fair Attribution to Indexed Reports (FAIR) Metrics to quantify adherence to good citation practices via systematic semantic comparison of statements in the target document to those found in cited and uncited prior reports. In the present work, we define new FAIR Metrics for assessing the quality of peer review, extend the FAIR Metrics module of the PDP-DREAM Ontology with additional classes and properties needed to record FAIR Metrics analysis of a peer review, and demonstrate use with a simple example.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages2
ISBN (Electronic)9798350365610
ISBN (Print)9798350365627
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2024
Event20th IEEE International Conference on e-Science, e-Science 2024 - Osaka, Japan
Duration: 16 Sept 202420 Sept 2024
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/10677510/proceeding

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Conference on e-Science
PublisherIEEE
ISSN (Print)2325-372X
ISSN (Electronic)2325-3703

Conference

Conference20th IEEE International Conference on e-Science, e-Science 2024
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityOsaka
Period16/09/2420/09/24
Internet address

User-Defined Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • ethics and integrity
  • peer review
  • scholarly research
  • scientific publishing
  • semantic web

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'FAIR Metrics for Motivating Excellence in Peer Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this