Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Face and Favours: Network Norms among Chinese Migrants and Non-Migrants in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The few theoretical studies comparing guanxi (interpersonal relationships) and social capital suggest that both network types are based on norms of trust and reciprocity, but guanxi is also underpinned by strong and recognisable normative dynamics of renqing (reciprocity) and face. However, there has been little empirical investigation into these differences. We compare networking practices among Australian Chinese migrants (ACMs) and Australian non-migrants (ANMs) via qualitative interviews, showing: (i) ACMs and ANMs use strong and weak ties differently due to normative differences; (ii) ACMs initiate guanxi dynamics with ANMs whenever possible, but ANMs lack cultural knowledge for reciprocation; and (iii) ACMs? connections to non-Chinese people are consequently not guanxi-based, but grounded in Western social capital.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-559
Number of pages21
JournalAsian Studies Review
Volume49
Issue number3
Early online date20 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

User-Defined Keywords

  • Australia
  • Chinese migration
  • face
  • guanxi (interpersonal relationships)
  • renqing (reciprocity)
  • social networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Face and Favours: Network Norms among Chinese Migrants and Non-Migrants in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this