Abstract
The few theoretical studies comparing guanxi (interpersonal relationships) and social capital suggest that both network types are based on norms of trust and reciprocity, but guanxi is also underpinned by strong and recognisable normative dynamics of renqing (reciprocity) and face. However, there has been little empirical investigation into these differences. We compare networking practices among Australian Chinese migrants (ACMs) and Australian non-migrants (ANMs) via qualitative interviews, showing: (i) ACMs and ANMs use strong and weak ties differently due to normative differences; (ii) ACMs initiate guanxi dynamics with ANMs whenever possible, but ANMs lack cultural knowledge for reciprocation; and (iii) ACMs? connections to non-Chinese people are consequently not guanxi-based, but grounded in Western social capital.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 539-559 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Asian Studies Review |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Jan 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
User-Defined Keywords
- Australia
- Chinese migration
- face
- guanxi (interpersonal relationships)
- renqing (reciprocity)
- social networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Face and Favours: Network Norms among Chinese Migrants and Non-Migrants in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver