Abstract
Limitarianism, introduced by Robeyns, advocates for establishing a maximum threshold on individual wealth to prevent excessive accumulation. Robeyns’ work primarily draws from Western thought and does not engage with East Asian traditions such as Confucianism. This paper aims to bridge that gap by exploring the potential for dialogue between limitarianism and Confucianism on economic equality and distributive justice, using sufficientarianism as a nexus. I examine how Confucianism and limitarianism each relate to sufficientarianism and how these relationships can facilitate meaningful exchanges. Confucianism could potentially align with limitarianism by presenting it as a pragmatic, problem-driven philosophy for achieving economic equality consistent with Confucian ideals. The paper also addresses limitations of this dialogue and suggests potential directions for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 228-236 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Global Ethics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Confucianism
- economic distribution
- equality
- limitarianism
- sufficientarianism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver