Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Limitarianism, introduced by Robeyns, advocates for establishing a maximum threshold on individual wealth to prevent excessive accumulation. Robeyns’ work primarily draws from Western thought and does not engage with East Asian traditions such as Confucianism. This paper aims to bridge that gap by exploring the potential for dialogue between limitarianism and Confucianism on economic equality and distributive justice, using sufficientarianism as a nexus. I examine how Confucianism and limitarianism each relate to sufficientarianism and how these relationships can facilitate meaningful exchanges. Confucianism could potentially align with limitarianism by presenting it as a pragmatic, problem-driven philosophy for achieving economic equality consistent with Confucian ideals. The paper also addresses limitations of this dialogue and suggests potential directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-236
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Global Ethics
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

User-Defined Keywords

  • Confucianism
  • economic distribution
  • equality
  • limitarianism
  • sufficientarianism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this