Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism

Benedict S. B. Chan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Limitarianism, introduced by Robeyns, advocates for establishing a maximum threshold on individual wealth to prevent excessive accumulation. Robeyns’ work primarily draws from Western thought and does not engage with East Asian traditions such as Confucianism. This paper aims to bridge that gap by exploring the potential for dialogue between limitarianism and Confucianism on economic equality and distributive justice, using sufficientarianism as a nexus. I examine how Confucianism and limitarianism each relate to sufficientarianism and how these relationships can facilitate meaningful exchanges. Confucianism could potentially align with limitarianism by presenting it as a pragmatic, problem-driven philosophy for achieving economic equality consistent with Confucian ideals. The paper also addresses limitations of this dialogue and suggests potential directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-236
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Global Ethics
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Confucianism
  • economic distribution
  • equality
  • limitarianism
  • sufficientarianism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring economic equality through a dialogue between Confucianism and limitarianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this