Abstract
This paper proposes an approach to evaluate the environmental performance of design alternatives during new product development (NPD) processes. The use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches with life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate design alternatives' environmental performance during NPD processes is first discussed. The proposed approach integrates an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with evidential reasoning (ER) in the environmental performances evaluation and prioritization of different design options. A case study is described to illustrate the use of the proposed method.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1182-1189 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | IEEE Systems Journal |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
User-Defined Keywords
- Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
- eco design
- evidential reasoning (ER)
- life cycle assessment (LCA)
- new product development (NPD)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of design alternatives' environmental performance using AHP and ER approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver