Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of design alternatives' environmental performance using AHP and ER approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach to evaluate the environmental performance of design alternatives during new product development (NPD) processes. The use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches with life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate design alternatives' environmental performance during NPD processes is first discussed. The proposed approach integrates an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with evidential reasoning (ER) in the environmental performances evaluation and prioritization of different design options. A case study is described to illustrate the use of the proposed method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1182-1189
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Systems Journal
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

User-Defined Keywords

  • Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
  • eco design
  • evidential reasoning (ER)
  • life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • new product development (NPD)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of design alternatives' environmental performance using AHP and ER approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this