TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the institutional performance of the Pearl River Delta integration policy through intercity cooperation network analysis
AU - Zhang, Xianchun
AU - Guo, Quan En
AU - Cheung, Darren Man Wai
AU - Zhang, Tianyao
N1 - Publisher copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Adopting a macroscopic perspective, this study employs intercity cooperation network analysis to assess the institutional performance of the Pearl River Delta's (PRD) integration policy. To assess whether the existing PRD intercity cooperation network is advancing the three objectives of the PRD integration policy in terms of cooperation patterns, actors' involvement, and cooperation fields, this study analyzed news published on the Internet and official government websites. The study concludes that: (1) the Shenzhen-Dongguan-Huizhou sub-region (SDH) and the Zhuhai-Zhongshan-Jiangmen sub-region (ZZJ) are entirely integrated as institutional entities, while Zhaoqing and Yunfu have not been integrated into the Guangzhou-Foshan-Zhaoqing sub-region (GFZ); (2) the PRD integration process remains a government-led administrative process, with market and civil society actors having had little influence on the governance structure; and (3) the primary areas of cooperation involve institutional design and economic development, and secondary functions, such as entertainment, education, and environmental protection, have not been fully undertaken. We also consider that the PRD's institutional spatial structure is a monocentric structure centered on Shenzhen, which is inconsistent with previous studies indicating a functional spatial structure known as a “Polynuclear Urban Region.”
AB - Adopting a macroscopic perspective, this study employs intercity cooperation network analysis to assess the institutional performance of the Pearl River Delta's (PRD) integration policy. To assess whether the existing PRD intercity cooperation network is advancing the three objectives of the PRD integration policy in terms of cooperation patterns, actors' involvement, and cooperation fields, this study analyzed news published on the Internet and official government websites. The study concludes that: (1) the Shenzhen-Dongguan-Huizhou sub-region (SDH) and the Zhuhai-Zhongshan-Jiangmen sub-region (ZZJ) are entirely integrated as institutional entities, while Zhaoqing and Yunfu have not been integrated into the Guangzhou-Foshan-Zhaoqing sub-region (GFZ); (2) the PRD integration process remains a government-led administrative process, with market and civil society actors having had little influence on the governance structure; and (3) the primary areas of cooperation involve institutional design and economic development, and secondary functions, such as entertainment, education, and environmental protection, have not been fully undertaken. We also consider that the PRD's institutional spatial structure is a monocentric structure centered on Shenzhen, which is inconsistent with previous studies indicating a functional spatial structure known as a “Polynuclear Urban Region.”
KW - Integration policy
KW - Institutional performance
KW - Intercity cooperation network
KW - Pearl River Delta
KW - City-regionalism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046155347&doi=10.1016%2fj.cities.2018.04.002&partnerID=40&md5=6fa9601d9e49ce48fe13fa57872c384d
U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.002
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0264-2751
VL - 81
SP - 131
EP - 144
JO - Cities
JF - Cities
ER -