Abstract
This essay first discusses the three major arguments in favor of euthanasia and physician-assisted-suicide in contemporary Western society, viz., the arguments of mercy, preventing indignity, and individual autonomy. It then articulates both Confucian consonance and dissonance to them. The first two arguments make use of Confucian discussions on suicide whereas the last argument appeals to Confucian social-political thought. It concludes that from the Confucian moral perspectives, none of the three arguments is fully convincing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-77 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Dao |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
User-Defined Keywords
- Assisted suicide
- Autonomy
- Confucianism
- Euthanasia
- Indignity
- Mercy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Euthanasia and assisted suicide from confucian moral perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver