Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electrophysiological evaluation of sensory and motor pathways after incomplete unilateral spinal cord contusion: Laboratory investigation

  • Faith A. Bazley
  • , Charles Hu
  • , Anil Maybhate
  • , Amir Pourmorteza
  • , Nikta Pashai
  • , Nitish V. Thakor
  • , Candace L. Kerr
  • , Angelo H. All*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. Unilateral contusions represent an increasingly popular model for studying the pathways and recovery mechanisms of spinal cord injury (SCI). Current studies rely heavily on motor behavior scoring and histological evidence to make assessments. Electrophysiology represents one way to reliably quantify the functionality of motor pathways. The authors sought to quantify the functional integrity of the bilateral motor and sensory pathways following unilateral SCI by using measurements of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials (MEPs and SSEPs, respectively).

Methods. Eighteen rats were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving a mild unilateral contusion, a mild midline contusion, or a laminectomy only (control). Contusions were induced at T-8 using a MASCIS impactor. Electrophysiological analysis, motor behavior scoring, and histological quantifications were then performed to identify relationships among pathway conductivity, motor function, and tissue preservation.

Results. Hindlimb MEPs ipsilateral to the injury showed recovery by Day 28 after injury and corresponded to approximately 61% of spared corticospinal tract (CST) tissue. In contrast, MEPs of the midline-injured group did not recover, and correspondingly > 90% of the CST tissue was damaged. Somatosensory evoked potentials showed only a moderate reduction in amplitude, with no difference in latency for the pathways ipsilateral to injury. Furthermore, these SSEPs were significantly better than those of the midline-injured rats for the same amount of white matter damage.

Conclusions. Motor evoked potential recovery corresponded to the amount of spared CST in unilateral and midline injuries, but motor behavior consistently recovered independent of MEPs. These data support the idea that spared contralateral pathways aid in reducing the functional deficits of injured ipsilateral pathways and further support the idea of CNS plasticity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-423
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

User-Defined Keywords

  • Corticospinal tract
  • Motor evoked potential
  • Rat
  • Somatosensory evoked potential
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Unilateral contusion injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrophysiological evaluation of sensory and motor pathways after incomplete unilateral spinal cord contusion: Laboratory investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this