Egalitarian sexism: Kant's defense of monogamy and its implications for the future evolution of marriage II

Stephen R PALMQUIST*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This second part of a two-part series exploring implications of the natural differences between the sexes for the cultural evolution of marriage considers how the institution of marriage might evolve, if Kant's reasons for defending monogamy are extended and applied to a future culture. After summarizing the philosophical framework for making cross-cultural ethical assessments that was introduced in Part I and then explaining Kant's portrayal of marriage as an antidote to the objectifying tendencies of sex, I summarize Kant's reasons for rejecting polygamy and for viewing monogamy as the only ethically acceptable form of marriage. Finally, I argue that if we apply Kantian principles to the real situation of marriage in many modern cultures, and if we wish to maintain a legitimate place for marriage in the future evolution of human culture, then the future evolution of marriage laws must recognize polyfidelity (i.e., plural marriages for both men and women) as being just as legitimate as monogamy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-144
Number of pages18
JournalEthics and Bioethics (in Central Europe)
Volume7
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Education
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

User-Defined Keywords

  • Cross-cultural assessments
  • Egalitarian ethics
  • Immanuel Kant
  • Marriage law
  • Monogamy
  • Polyfidelity
  • Polygamy
  • Sexism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Egalitarian sexism: Kant's defense of monogamy and its implications for the future evolution of marriage II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this