TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses on balance and stability in older adults
T2 - A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
AU - Jor, Abu
AU - Kobayashi, Toshiki
AU - Khan, Mohammad Jobair
AU - Hosen Opu, Shakawath
AU - Lam, Wing Kai
AU - Winser, Stanley J.
AU - Gao, Fan
AU - Zhang, Ming
N1 - This study was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council, University Grants Committee (No. PolyU15211322).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2026/1
Y1 - 2026/1
N2 - Background: Somatosensory
stimulation foot orthoses (SSFO) are recommended to enhance postural
balance by stimulating mechanoreceptors. However, the underlying
mechanisms by which SSFO with varying protrusion designs influence
postural balance remain unclear.Research question: How do SSFO affect postural balance in older adults, and what role do variations in protrusion design play in these effects?Methods: A
systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus,
CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Eighteen
studies with 27 SSFO conditions examining the effects on static and
dynamic balance in older adults were included in the meta-analysis.
Balance parameters reported in at least 10 SSFO conditions were further
analyzed using meta-regression analysis.Results: Pooled
analyses indicated that SSFO use reduced center of pressure (CoP)
displacement during standing, particularly in studies evaluating
immediate effects and using SSFO with specific design features.
Meta-regression analysis revealed significant positive correlations
between effect sizes for anteroposterior CoP range and SSFO with
arch-support structures [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001]
or site-specific protrusions [Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56),
p = 0.008]. SSFO also significantly improved Timed Up and Go scores
[MD= -1.15, 95 % CI (-1.82, −0.47), p < 0.001], while no significant
changes were observed in gait or other functional mobility measures.Significance: These
findings underscore the potential of customized SSFO designs to enhance
mechanoreceptor stimulation and improve postural balance in older
adults. While design-specific SSFO may support improvements in static
balance for clinical applications, evidence of benefits on gait and
broader functional mobility is still limited.Registration (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024592630)
AB - Background: Somatosensory
stimulation foot orthoses (SSFO) are recommended to enhance postural
balance by stimulating mechanoreceptors. However, the underlying
mechanisms by which SSFO with varying protrusion designs influence
postural balance remain unclear.Research question: How do SSFO affect postural balance in older adults, and what role do variations in protrusion design play in these effects?Methods: A
systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus,
CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Eighteen
studies with 27 SSFO conditions examining the effects on static and
dynamic balance in older adults were included in the meta-analysis.
Balance parameters reported in at least 10 SSFO conditions were further
analyzed using meta-regression analysis.Results: Pooled
analyses indicated that SSFO use reduced center of pressure (CoP)
displacement during standing, particularly in studies evaluating
immediate effects and using SSFO with specific design features.
Meta-regression analysis revealed significant positive correlations
between effect sizes for anteroposterior CoP range and SSFO with
arch-support structures [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001]
or site-specific protrusions [Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56),
p = 0.008]. SSFO also significantly improved Timed Up and Go scores
[MD= -1.15, 95 % CI (-1.82, −0.47), p < 0.001], while no significant
changes were observed in gait or other functional mobility measures.Significance: These
findings underscore the potential of customized SSFO designs to enhance
mechanoreceptor stimulation and improve postural balance in older
adults. While design-specific SSFO may support improvements in static
balance for clinical applications, evidence of benefits on gait and
broader functional mobility is still limited.Registration (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024592630)
KW - Elderly
KW - Insole
KW - Orthosis
KW - Orthotic
KW - Postural balance
KW - Shoe inserts
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016791746
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40998603
AN - SCOPUS:105016791746
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 123
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
M1 - 109974
ER -