TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
AU - Jin, Hao
AU - Kim, Seungmo
AU - Love, Adam
AU - Jin, Yun
AU - Zhao, Jie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Jin, Kim, Love, Jin and Zhao.
PY - 2022/12/12
Y1 - 2022/12/12
N2 - Introduction: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction.Methods: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model.Results: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction.Discussion: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes.
AB - Introduction: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction.Methods: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model.Results: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction.Discussion: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes.
KW - athlete satisfaction
KW - autocratic leadership
KW - coach-athlete relationship
KW - democratic leadership
KW - motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144934794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144934794
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1012953
ER -