TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of foot orthoses on running kinetics and kinematics
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Jor, Abu
AU - Lau, Noelle W.K.
AU - Daryabor, Aliyeh
AU - Koh, Mark W.P.
AU - Lam, Wing Kai
AU - Hobara, Hiroaki
AU - Kobayashi, Toshiki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Background: Foot orthoses (FOs) are often prescribed by clinicians to treat foot and ankle conditions, prevent running injuries, and enhance performance. However, the lack of higher-order synthesis of clinical trials makes it challenging for clinicians to adopt an evidence-based approach to FOs’ prescriptions. Research question: Do FOs with different modifications alter lower extremity running kinematics and kinetics? Methods: A systematic search of seven databases was conducted from inception to February 2023. The analysis was restricted to healthy adults without foot musculoskeletal impairments and studies that compared the FOs effects with the controls. The methodological quality of the 35 studies that met the eligibility criteria was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black checklist. The random effects model estimated the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals and effect sizes. Sub-group analyses based on FOs type were performed to assess the potential effects of the intervention. Results: Our findings indicated that both custom and off-the-shelf arch-support FOs reduced peak plantar pressure at the medial heel (SMD=−0.35, and SMD=−1.03), lateral heel (SMD=−0.50, and SMD=−0.53), and medial forefoot (SMD=−0.20, and SMD=−0.27), but increased plantar pressure at the mid-foot (SMD=0.30, and SMD=0.56). Compared with the controls, significant increases (SMD=0.36) in perceived comfort were found with custom FOs. A reduction (SMD=−0.58) in initial ankle inversion was found when a raised heel cup was integrated with arch-support FOs. A medial post integrated with arch support exhibited a reduced ankle (SMD=−1.66) and tibial (SMD=−0.63) range of motion. Custom FOs, however, unfavorably affected the running economy (SMD=−0.25) and perceived exertion (SMD=0.20). Significance: Although FOs have been reported to have some positive biomechanical effects in healthy populations without musculoskeletal impairments or running-related issues, they need to be optimized and generalized to achieve better running performance and prevent injury.
AB - Background: Foot orthoses (FOs) are often prescribed by clinicians to treat foot and ankle conditions, prevent running injuries, and enhance performance. However, the lack of higher-order synthesis of clinical trials makes it challenging for clinicians to adopt an evidence-based approach to FOs’ prescriptions. Research question: Do FOs with different modifications alter lower extremity running kinematics and kinetics? Methods: A systematic search of seven databases was conducted from inception to February 2023. The analysis was restricted to healthy adults without foot musculoskeletal impairments and studies that compared the FOs effects with the controls. The methodological quality of the 35 studies that met the eligibility criteria was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black checklist. The random effects model estimated the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals and effect sizes. Sub-group analyses based on FOs type were performed to assess the potential effects of the intervention. Results: Our findings indicated that both custom and off-the-shelf arch-support FOs reduced peak plantar pressure at the medial heel (SMD=−0.35, and SMD=−1.03), lateral heel (SMD=−0.50, and SMD=−0.53), and medial forefoot (SMD=−0.20, and SMD=−0.27), but increased plantar pressure at the mid-foot (SMD=0.30, and SMD=0.56). Compared with the controls, significant increases (SMD=0.36) in perceived comfort were found with custom FOs. A reduction (SMD=−0.58) in initial ankle inversion was found when a raised heel cup was integrated with arch-support FOs. A medial post integrated with arch support exhibited a reduced ankle (SMD=−1.66) and tibial (SMD=−0.63) range of motion. Custom FOs, however, unfavorably affected the running economy (SMD=−0.25) and perceived exertion (SMD=0.20). Significance: Although FOs have been reported to have some positive biomechanical effects in healthy populations without musculoskeletal impairments or running-related issues, they need to be optimized and generalized to achieve better running performance and prevent injury.
KW - Gait
KW - Ground reaction force (GRF)
KW - Insole
KW - Joint angle and moment
KW - Plantar pressure
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85185496088
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224000481?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.02.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38367456
AN - SCOPUS:85185496088
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 109
SP - 240
EP - 258
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -