TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness and Reliability of Foot Orthoses on Impact Loading and Lower Limb Kinematics When Running at Preferred and Nonpreferred Speeds
AU - Wang, Yi
AU - Lam, Wing K.
AU - Wong, Charis K.
AU - Park, Lok Y.
AU - Tan, Mohammad F.
AU - Leung, Aaron Kam Lun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Human Kinetics, Inc.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (grant number: 20BTY029) and Science Foundation of the State Key Laboratory (grant number: SMFA18B09). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - This study examined the effect of foot orthoses used on ground reaction forces, ankle, and knee kinematics when running at preferred and nonpreferred speeds. Sixteen runners ran on instrumented treadmills at various speeds (90%, 100%, and 110% of preferred speed) when wearing arch-support and flat-control orthoses. Two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the mean and coefficient of variation of all variables. Results indicated that arch-support orthoses experienced larger maximum loading rates than flat-control orthoses (P = .017, 95% CI, 2.22 to 19.53). Slower speed was related to smaller loading rates (preferred: P = .002, 95% CI, −17.02 to −4.20; faster: P = .003, 95% CI, −29.78 to −6.17), shorter stride length (preferred: P < .001, 95% CI, −0.204 to −0.090; faster: P < .001, 95% CI, −0.382 to −0.237), and longer contact time (preferred: P < .001, 95% CI, 0.006–0.021; faster: 95% CI, 0.012–0.042). In arch-support condition, preferred speed induced higher stride length coefficient of variation (P = .046, 95% CI, 0.035–1.117) than faster speed, while displaying no differences in flat-control condition. These findings suggest that the use of arch-support orthoses would influence impact loading, but not spatial-temporal and joint kinematics in recreational runners.
AB - This study examined the effect of foot orthoses used on ground reaction forces, ankle, and knee kinematics when running at preferred and nonpreferred speeds. Sixteen runners ran on instrumented treadmills at various speeds (90%, 100%, and 110% of preferred speed) when wearing arch-support and flat-control orthoses. Two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the mean and coefficient of variation of all variables. Results indicated that arch-support orthoses experienced larger maximum loading rates than flat-control orthoses (P = .017, 95% CI, 2.22 to 19.53). Slower speed was related to smaller loading rates (preferred: P = .002, 95% CI, −17.02 to −4.20; faster: P = .003, 95% CI, −29.78 to −6.17), shorter stride length (preferred: P < .001, 95% CI, −0.204 to −0.090; faster: P < .001, 95% CI, −0.382 to −0.237), and longer contact time (preferred: P < .001, 95% CI, 0.006–0.021; faster: 95% CI, 0.012–0.042). In arch-support condition, preferred speed induced higher stride length coefficient of variation (P = .046, 95% CI, 0.035–1.117) than faster speed, while displaying no differences in flat-control condition. These findings suggest that the use of arch-support orthoses would influence impact loading, but not spatial-temporal and joint kinematics in recreational runners.
KW - Arch-support
KW - Foot orthotics
KW - Ground reaction force
KW - Insoles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100983575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/JAB.2019-0281
DO - 10.1123/JAB.2019-0281
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33232937
AN - SCOPUS:85100983575
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 37
SP - 66
EP - 73
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 1
ER -