TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Doing power' at work
T2 - Responding to male and female management styles in a global business corporation
AU - Ladegaard, Hans J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in the article is part of a large-scale study of Global Communication in Danish Business Organizations which was supported by a grant from the Danish Research Council and two multinational corporations. The focus of this article is a sub-project on male and female management styles which was supported by a Hong Kong Baptist University Humanities Faculty Research Grant (FRG/06-07/II-62). * Tel.: +852 3411 7167; fax: +852 3411 7895. E-mail address: [email protected].
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - In the literature on professional management, it is argued that female leaders prefer a more indirect, people-oriented, democratic management style, whereas male leaders are more likely to favor a direct, task-oriented and authoritarian approach. This paper reports on an empirical study of communication in business organizations, and the focus is on the actual sociolinguistic behaviour of male and female leaders performing similar tasks. Executive managers of both sexes in a large Danish corporation were asked to record themselves during a typical day at work while performing a range of tasks, such as giving directives to their staff and chairing meetings. The analyses show that both male and female leaders tend to prefer an indirect, normatively feminine management style. They also show that male leaders are more likely to use a wide verbal repertoire style drawing on elements in their speech that are both normatively male and normatively female. However, the most significant difference is how male and female leaders' management styles are perceived and responded to by male and female employees. While the authority of male leaders is never questioned, several examples in the data show that female leaders are often challenged, and their authority questioned, by their male colleagues.
AB - In the literature on professional management, it is argued that female leaders prefer a more indirect, people-oriented, democratic management style, whereas male leaders are more likely to favor a direct, task-oriented and authoritarian approach. This paper reports on an empirical study of communication in business organizations, and the focus is on the actual sociolinguistic behaviour of male and female leaders performing similar tasks. Executive managers of both sexes in a large Danish corporation were asked to record themselves during a typical day at work while performing a range of tasks, such as giving directives to their staff and chairing meetings. The analyses show that both male and female leaders tend to prefer an indirect, normatively feminine management style. They also show that male leaders are more likely to use a wide verbal repertoire style drawing on elements in their speech that are both normatively male and normatively female. However, the most significant difference is how male and female leaders' management styles are perceived and responded to by male and female employees. While the authority of male leaders is never questioned, several examples in the data show that female leaders are often challenged, and their authority questioned, by their male colleagues.
KW - Male–female management styles
KW - Organizational communication
KW - Language and power
KW - Critical Discourse Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049469906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.006
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:78049469906
SN - 0378-2166
VL - 43
SP - 4
EP - 19
JO - Journal of Pragmatics
JF - Journal of Pragmatics
IS - 1
ER -