Do Virtual Influencers Really Persuade? A Meta-Analysis of Their Effectiveness

  • Eunjin Anna Kim
  • , Hye Min Kim
  • , Donggyu Kim
  • , Joo-Wha Hong
  • , Jiemin Looi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperpeer-review

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates the comparative marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers (VIs) and human influencers, addressing a timely question amidst the burgeoning VI market. Examining 48 studies through a random-effects model using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, we analyze the impact of VIs on brand and influencer attitudes, message evaluation, and purchase intent. Our findings reveal significant differences in consumer responses to VIs versus human influencers, providing valuable insights for brands navigating the evolving influencer landscape.This research offers a comprehensive understanding of when and how VIs can be strategically deployed to maximize marketing ROI.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2025
Event2025 Global Marketing Conference at Hong Kong - , Hong Kong, China
Duration: 24 Jul 202527 Jul 2025
https://2025gmc.imweb.me/ (Conference website)
https://easychair.org/smart-program/2025GMC/index.html (Conference program)

Conference

Conference2025 Global Marketing Conference at Hong Kong
Country/TerritoryHong Kong, China
Period24/07/2527/07/25
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Virtual Influencers Really Persuade? A Meta-Analysis of Their Effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this