Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Divide and govern: institutionalisation, worker segmentation, and labour control in China’s bianwai employment reforms

  • Liliang Rong*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article draws on Labour Process Theory (LPT) to examine the institutionalisation of bianwai (BW; non-established) employment in China’s public sector. Combining analysis of 76 labour dispute judgements with ethnographic fieldwork in R County, the study shows that BW reforms did not produce universal labour improvement. Instead, institutional recognition divided workers into ‘recognized’ and ‘unrecognized’ groups, generating unequal access to stability, welfare, and legal protection. Courts further reinforced this process through restrictive interpretations of labour relations and compensation claims. The article argues that public-sector employment remains shaped by labour control and cost-reduction imperatives. Rather than proposing a new theoretical framework for labour control, this article applies the broad analytical insights of LPT to China’s public sector, where BW employment has become an increasingly important institutional mechanism for workforce management but has received limited attention from a labour process perspective.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLabour and Industry
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

User-Defined Keywords

  • Bianwai employment
  • labour process theory
  • institutionalisation
  • labour control
  • public sector reform
  • China
  • employment termination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Divide and govern: institutionalisation, worker segmentation, and labour control in China’s bianwai employment reforms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this