Disorganized popular contention and local institutional building in China: A case study in Guangdong

Feng Chen*, Yi Kang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)


Concurring with the approach stressing the role of contentious politics in (re)shaping state institutions, this study explores how disorganized popular contentions configure local institutional building in China. As Chinese citizens are not legally allowed to take organized collective action to express their grievances and demands, popular contentions, despite their common origins, similar claims and identical targets, break out here and there in large numbers without clear organizational shape. This compels the government to build institutions able to map scattered conflicts, detect potential problems and defuse them on a case-by-case basis in a timely fashion. Such a dissipative approach is distinguished, by its purpose, format and mechanism, from two common types of state responses to popular contentions—incorporation and repression—which are typically linked to democracies and authoritarian developing states where popular contentions are often organized in various ways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)596-612
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Contemporary China
Issue number100
Early online date7 Apr 2016
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2016

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Disorganized popular contention and local institutional building in China: A case study in Guangdong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this