Abstract
Despite decades of research on distress disclosure, existing scales inadequately capture the multifaceted nature of perceived disclosure risks, particularly in collectivist cultural contexts where concerns extend beyond the individual to family and relational obligations. This research proposes a scale that more fully addresses the social and relational vulnerabilities specific to distress disclosure. Three studies with Chinese adults (n = 1728) were conducted to establish and validate the 16-item multidimensional Distress Disclosure Risk Scale (DDRS-16), comprising three dimensions of perceived risk of distress disclosure: social judgment, disclosure vulnerability, and imposition. Incorporating collectivist values, the DDRS-16 offers a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of distress disclosure overlooked in existing scales developed exclusively from Western samples.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-26 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 May 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
User-Defined Keywords
- disclosure decision
- disclosure risks
- distress disclosure
- factor analysis
- scale development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of the Distress Disclosure Risk Scale: Assessing the Perceived Social and Relational Vulnerabilities in Communicating One’s Troubles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver