Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Designing Ghosts, Queer Readership, and the Phantom Public in E. M. Forster’s ‘Dr Woolacott’

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

    Abstract

    In an undated manuscript from the 1920s, E. M. Forster sketched out notes towards a theory he called ‘writing to the body with the body’, a ‘melting’ of sentiment into disinterested aesthetics, he identified as pornographic. The ‘On Pornography and Sentiment’ fragment not only reframes our understanding of Forster’s emerging stance during this period as a champion of free speech but also highlights his less well-known status as the nodal figure for a younger generation of gay writers with whom he shared drafts of his erotic short stories. My close readings of selections from Forster’s unfinished notes, his roughly contemporary work of criticism, Aspects of the Novel (1927), as well as his posthumously published short story, ‘Dr Woolacott’, suggest that Forster’s theory of sentimentalized aesthetics made the beginnings of a capable critique. By circulating his short stories, Forster sought to check mainstream censoriousness concerning ‘obscene’ texts; moreover, his ‘refunctioning’ of illicit desires to an ethical purpose enlivened the ‘phantom’ potential of the modernist public sphere (Robbins) and actively facilitated the formation of an inter-generational intimate public (Berlant).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)974–991
    Number of pages18
    JournalThe Review of English Studies
    Volume72
    Issue number307
    Early online date11 Feb 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Designing Ghosts, Queer Readership, and the Phantom Public in E. M. Forster’s ‘Dr Woolacott’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this