Depression Literacy in Alberta: Findings From a General Population Sample

Jianli Wang, Carol Adair, Gordon Fick, D. W. L. Lai, Beth Evans, Brenda Waye Perry, Anthony Jorm, Donald Addington

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:To assess the public's knowledge about depression, attitudes toward treatments for depression, perceived causal factors for depression, and reported prognoses of depression, overall and by sex.
Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey in Alberta between February and June 2006. We used a random phone number selection procedure to identify a sample of adults in the community (n = 3047). Participants were presented with a vignette describing an individual with depression and then asked questions to assess recognition of depression, attitudes toward mental health treatments, possible causal factors for depression, and prognosis of depression.
Results:The response rate was 75.2 %. Among the final participants, 75.6% could correctly recognize depression described in a case vignette. General practitioners or family doctors were considered as being the best help for depression. Of the participants, 35% were in complete agreement with health professionals about appropriate interventions for depression, 28% believed in dealing with depression alone, and 43% thought that “weakness of character” was a likely cause of depression. Men had poorer mental health literacy than women and were more likely to endorse the use of alcohol to cope.
Conclusions:Mental health promotion and education efforts are needed to improve the general public's mental health literacy and to clarify misunderstanding about depression. Men need to be a particular target of these efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-449
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Journal of Psychiatry
Volume52
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Depression Literacy in Alberta: Findings From a General Population Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this