Defamilisation and leave policies–a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries

Ruby C.M. Chau; Liam Foster; Wai Kam YU

doi:10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286

Defamilisation and leave policies–a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries

Ruby C.M. Chau^*, Liam Foster, Wai Kam YU

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article joins the international debate on whether there is a unique East Asian welfare model. It examines the concept of defamilisation and compares various leave policies (maternity leave, paternity leave and extended parental leave) in five East Asian and nine non-East Asian countries. The welfare index method is used to classify these countries into different groupings. The findings show that the East Asian countries are not always internally homogeneous (being similar in key features), nor are they externally heterogeneous (showing significant differences from the others). Therefore, the existence of a unique East Asian welfare model is still in doubt.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	318-333
Number of pages	16
Journal	Journal of Asian Public Policy
Volume	10
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286
Publication status	Published - 2 Sept 2017

User-Defined Keywords

Defamilisation
East Asian welfare model
external heterogeneity
internal homogeneity
leave policies

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286

Cite this

@article{af502c63917249578f0a84071646fff5,

title = "Defamilisation and leave policies–a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries",

abstract = "This article joins the international debate on whether there is a unique East Asian welfare model. It examines the concept of defamilisation and compares various leave policies (maternity leave, paternity leave and extended parental leave) in five East Asian and nine non-East Asian countries. The welfare index method is used to classify these countries into different groupings. The findings show that the East Asian countries are not always internally homogeneous (being similar in key features), nor are they externally heterogeneous (showing significant differences from the others). Therefore, the existence of a unique East Asian welfare model is still in doubt.",

keywords = "Defamilisation, East Asian welfare model, external heterogeneity, internal homogeneity, leave policies",

author = "Chau, {Ruby C.M.} and Liam Foster and YU, {Wai Kam}",

note = "Funding Information: Part of this work has received funding from European Union?s Horizon 2010 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement 708305. The authors are thankful for the opportunity to present and discuss this article at the Fourth International Conference on Social Policy and Governance Innovation. They are also grateful for the journal reviewers? comments, which have helped to improve the article in many ways.",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "318--333",

journal = "Journal of Asian Public Policy",

issn = "1751-6234",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defamilisation and leave policies–a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries

AU - Chau, Ruby C.M.

AU - Foster, Liam

AU - YU, Wai Kam

N1 - Funding Information: Part of this work has received funding from European Union?s Horizon 2010 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement 708305. The authors are thankful for the opportunity to present and discuss this article at the Fourth International Conference on Social Policy and Governance Innovation. They are also grateful for the journal reviewers? comments, which have helped to improve the article in many ways.

PY - 2017/9/2

Y1 - 2017/9/2

N2 - This article joins the international debate on whether there is a unique East Asian welfare model. It examines the concept of defamilisation and compares various leave policies (maternity leave, paternity leave and extended parental leave) in five East Asian and nine non-East Asian countries. The welfare index method is used to classify these countries into different groupings. The findings show that the East Asian countries are not always internally homogeneous (being similar in key features), nor are they externally heterogeneous (showing significant differences from the others). Therefore, the existence of a unique East Asian welfare model is still in doubt.

AB - This article joins the international debate on whether there is a unique East Asian welfare model. It examines the concept of defamilisation and compares various leave policies (maternity leave, paternity leave and extended parental leave) in five East Asian and nine non-East Asian countries. The welfare index method is used to classify these countries into different groupings. The findings show that the East Asian countries are not always internally homogeneous (being similar in key features), nor are they externally heterogeneous (showing significant differences from the others). Therefore, the existence of a unique East Asian welfare model is still in doubt.

KW - Defamilisation

KW - East Asian welfare model

KW - external heterogeneity

KW - internal homogeneity

KW - leave policies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018308001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286

DO - 10.1080/17516234.2017.1322286

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85018308001

SN - 1751-6234

VL - 10

SP - 318

EP - 333

JO - Journal of Asian Public Policy

JF - Journal of Asian Public Policy

IS - 3

ER -

Defamilisation and leave policies–a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries

Abstract

User-Defined Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this