Abstract
With the increase in citizen-generated news, the need to understand how individual predispositions interact with news sources to influence perceptions of news credibility becomes increasingly important. Using a web-based experiment, this study examines the influences individual predispositions toward the media and politics have on perceived credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism. Analyzing data drawn from a representative sample of the U.S. adult population, results indicate that media skepticism and political cynicism interact, such that cynics and skeptics perceive citizen journalism as more credible, while non-cynics and non-skeptics think mainstream journalism is more credible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 452-470 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Citizen journalism
- Media credibility
- Media skepticism
- Political cynicism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cynics and skeptics: Evaluating the credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver