Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends

  • Jad Adrian Washif*
  • , Danny Lum
  • , Raja Mohammed Firhad Raja Azidin
  • , Jeffrey Pagaduan
  • , Julian Lim
  • , Erik Tan
  • , Nur Ikhwan Mohamad
  • , Carl James
  • , Christopher Martyn Beaven
  • , Lian Yee Kok
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Strength and conditioning (S&C) is a field within exercise science that advocates evidence-based practice. As empirical knowledge evolves, translation of this knowledge into coaching practice is expected. However, knowledge translation remains challenging across many industries, particularly S&C, due to varying professional standards and limited resources. This study investigated current practices, challenges, and trends among S&C coaches in Southeast Asia (SEA). Seventy-one S&C coaches (87% male) from major sports organisations completed an online survey covering demographics, job satisfaction, motivation, programming knowledge, AI use, training principles, and exercise methods. Frequency analysis and Chi-square tests assessed data distribution and group differences. Most coaches held a bachelor's degree (93%) and S&C certification(s) (73%). Approximately half (49%) were satisfied with their roles, with mixed views on salary (38% satisfied vs. 38% dissatisfied). Passion (89%) was the primary motivator, while limited facilities (72%) and financial incentives (61%) were common challenges. Coaches reported greater proficiency in strength (87%) than conditioning (57%) programming. AI use within programming (e.g., ChatGPT) was limited (8%). Exercise selection was guided by training goals (93%), experience (87%), specificity (85%), and periodisation (80%). Load intensity and progression were primarily prescribed using percent-based (80% and 85%, respectively) and RPE-based (80%, 72%), with lower use of velocity-based methods (48%, 34%). Application of conventional, eccentric-, concentric-, and isometric-emphasis training were widespread (≥85%), with 100% using supersets for strength and hypertrophy development. S&C coaches in SEA demonstrated foundational qualifications, programming skills, and awareness of evidence-based methods, while emphasising athlete-centred approaches and communication. Structured professional development, consideration of AI-based tools, and organisational support are recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Science and Coaching
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Apr 2026

User-Defined Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence conversational tool
  • athlete monitoring
  • communication
  • exercise prescription
  • periodization
  • resistance training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current strength and conditioning in Southeast Asia: Practices, challenges, and emerging trends'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this