Current practices of warm-up during strength training and conditioning based on coaching experience

Jad Adrian Washif, Christopher Martyn Beaven, Jeffrey Pagaduan, Julian Lim, Raja Mohammed Firhad Raja Azidin, Erik Tan, Danny Lum, Carl James

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Appropriate physical preparation for exercise is crucial for optimising exercise performance. This study investigated the warm-up practices of strength and conditioning coaches/practitioners within Southeast and East Asia. Methods: An online survey was administered to 58 professional strength and conditioning coaches from nine Southeast and East Asia countries. The survey investigated warm-up objectives, duration, activity types, physiological readiness assessments and exercise sequencing. Frequency analysis and Chi-square tests assessed data distribution and differences between experienced (≥ 10 years) and less-experienced (1–9 years) practitioners. Results: Most practitioners (91%) possessed education to at least undergraduate level and held industry certifications (72%). Primary warm-up objectives were injury prevention (88%), performance enhancement (86%), and mental preparation (64%). Readiness was typically determined qualitatively (e.g., asking “how do you feel?”) by ≥ 60% of practitioners, rather than quantitative methods. Warm-ups typically lasted 10–20 min (47% strength, 54% conditioning), although 43% (strength) lasted < 10 min. Most practitioners prescribed low-intensity activities (micro-activation and/or jogging/cycling), followed by stretching, jumping, and sport-specific exercises. Dynamic stretching was extremely common (97%), alongside micro-activations (mobility/band exercises) (88%). Simple jumps (vertical, 79%; pogo, 74%; horizontal, 74%), were common at the end of warm-ups. During strength training, practitioners (55%) prescribed warm-up sets, but only for the main exercises. Experienced practitioners utilised more foam rolling during micro-activation (p = 0.014), but all other prescriptions were not different. Conclusion: Warm-up prescriptions were largely similar across experience levels, with practitioners’ minimum qualifications comparable to those in other regions. The warm-ups delivered reflect current literature and best practices, incorporating structured routines and simple readiness appraisal.

Original languageEnglish
Article number840722
Number of pages13
JournalSport Sciences for Health
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Feb 2025

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

User-Defined Keywords

  • Athletes
  • Cool down
  • Dynamic stretching
  • Resistance training
  • Sport performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current practices of warm-up during strength training and conditioning based on coaching experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this