Abstract
Despite numerous research on public attributions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and subsequent responses, the question of how publics perceive CSR communications as a bolstering crisis response strategy remains partially unaddressed. Based on the integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) with the Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM), we conduct an experiment with a 2 (topic knowledge - crisis type: accidental vs. preventable) x 2 (persuasion knowledge - CSR attributions: values-driven vs. strategic-driven) x 2 (agent knowledge – leadership styles: transformational vs. transactional) design. Results show main and interaction effects on dependent variables such as crisis responsibility perceptions, attitudes toward the company, and behavioral intentions. We highlight a significant role of public inferences of CSR attributions and leadership styles in responding to a company’s crisis response strategy. Theoretical and practical implications will be discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 26 May 2017 |
Event | 67th Annual International Communication Association Conference, ICA 2017: Interventions. Communication Research and Practice - San Diego, CA, United States Duration: 25 May 2017 → 29 May 2017 https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ica/ica17/ |
Conference
Conference | 67th Annual International Communication Association Conference, ICA 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | San Diego, CA |
Period | 25/05/17 → 29/05/17 |
Internet address |