Coworkers’ relationship quality and interpersonal emotions in team-member dyads in China: The moderating role of cooperative team goals

Catherine K. Lam*, Xu HUANG, Frank Walter, Simon C.H. Chan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study investigates the origins of discrete interpersonal emotions in team-member dyads using two independent samples from an education institute and a telecommunication services company in China. Results across both studies showed that the quality of team members’ dyadic relationships positively relates to interpersonal admiration, sympathy, and envy, and negatively relates to interpersonal contempt. Furthermore, teams’ cooperative goals moderate these dyad-level linkages. The association of relationship quality with interpersonal emotions is particularly pronounced in teams with less cooperative goals but buffered in teams with more cooperative goals. Finally, on the individual level of analysis, envy and contempt are inversely associated with team members’ work performance, objectively measured. These findings provide new insights about key antecedents and crucial moderators in the development of interpersonal emotions in Chinese work teams and reiterate the relevance of these emotions for tangible performance outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)687-716
    Number of pages30
    JournalManagement and Organization Review
    Volume12
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Strategy and Management

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Cooperative team goals
    • Emotions in organizations
    • Relationship quality
    • Work teams

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coworkers’ relationship quality and interpersonal emotions in team-member dyads in China: The moderating role of cooperative team goals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this