Could complying with China’s secrecy laws be an excuse for auditors not to provide their working papers of auditing Chinese companies? Recent cases in the United States and Hong Kong

Raymond Siu Yeung Chan; John Kong Shan Ho

doi:10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129

Could complying with China’s secrecy laws be an excuse for auditors not to provide their working papers of auditing Chinese companies? Recent cases in the United States and Hong Kong

Raymond Siu Yeung Chan
, John Kong Shan Ho

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	99-128
Number of pages	30
Journal	King's Law Journal
Volume	26
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129
Publication status	Published - Jan 2015

Access to Document

10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129

Cite this

@article{35dbf334d4ad4af3ab05b71391780770,

title = "Could complying with China{\textquoteright}s secrecy laws be an excuse for auditors not to provide their working papers of auditing Chinese companies? Recent cases in the United States and Hong Kong",

author = "Chan, \{Raymond Siu Yeung\} and Ho, \{John Kong Shan\}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "99--128",

journal = "King's Law Journal",

issn = "0961-5768",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could complying with China’s secrecy laws be an excuse for auditors not to provide their working papers of auditing Chinese companies? Recent cases in the United States and Hong Kong

AU - Chan, Raymond Siu Yeung

AU - Ho, John Kong Shan

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044166297

U2 - 10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129

DO - 10.1080/09615768.2015.1035129

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85044166297

SN - 0961-5768

VL - 26

SP - 99

EP - 128

JO - King's Law Journal

JF - King's Law Journal

IS - 1

ER -

Could complying with China’s secrecy laws be an excuse for auditors not to provide their working papers of auditing Chinese companies? Recent cases in the United States and Hong Kong

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this