Cost-effectiveness of Dermabond versus sutures for lacerated wound closure: A randomised controlled trial

Eliza Mi Ling Wong*, T. H. Rainer, Ying Chu NG, M. S. Chan, V. Lopez

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    1. For management of simple lacerated wounds, tissue adhesive (Dermabond) achieved more positive outcomes but incurred higher cost, compared with standard sutures.
    2. Dermabond may be more cost-effective than standard sutures from a societal viewpoint.
    3. Use of sutures required more nursing time and additional costs from subsequent dressing, whereas use of Dermabond incurred higher equipment costs.
    4. Dermabond achieved better appearance outcome and patient satisfaction, compared with sutures.
    5. Pain levels were not significantly different in patients treated with Dermabond or sutures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S4-S8
    Number of pages5
    JournalHong Kong Medical Journal
    Volume17
    Issue number6, Suppl 6
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Medicine(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of Dermabond versus sutures for lacerated wound closure: A randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this