Contributions of physical and chemical properties of mild irritants to gastric cytoprotection in rats

J. K.S. Ko, C. H. Cho*, S. K. Lam, M. W.L. Koo, C. K. Ching

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study demonstrated the cytoprotective abilities of low concentrations of ethanol, NaCl and HCl, against the gastric mucosal damage caused by 100% ethanol, and the contributions of the physical and chemical properties of these mild irritants to their protective actions. The results have shown the differential protective effects of ethanol (10-40%), NaCl (2.5-12.5%) and HCl (0.15-0.45M), with the optimal cytoprotective concentrations being 20% ethanol, 5% NaCl and 0.3M HCl, respectively. Solutions of KCl and NaCl with similar osmolarity, and H2SO4 and HCl of similar acidity and osmolarity, all showed similar protective potentials as compared to the osmotic agent mannitol, which possessed a concentration- and tonicity-dependent protective action against 100% ethanol-induced mucosal damage. Same concentration of methanol, propan-2-ol and ethanol, having similar osmolarity with deionized water, exerted indifferent protective effects. It is therefore concluded that adaptive cytoprotection induced by low concentrations of NaCl and HCl could depend on their physical properties, while that of ethanol could act through its unique chemical property.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)PL13-PL18
Number of pages6
JournalLife Sciences
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 1995

Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

User-Defined Keywords

  • acidity
  • cytoprotection
  • gastric mucosal damage
  • mild irritants
  • osmolarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contributions of physical and chemical properties of mild irritants to gastric cytoprotection in rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this