Contribution and co-production: The collaborative culture of linnaean botany

Bettina DIETZ*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)


This essay aims to elucidate the collaborative dimension of the knowledge-making process in eighteenth-century Linnaean botany. Due to its ever increasing and potentially infinite need for information, Linnaean botany had to rely more and more heavily on the accumulation and aggregation of contributions by many people. This, in turn, had a crucial impact on the genesis and form of botanical publications: the more comprehensive the project, the larger the effect. It was the botanist Carl Linnaeus who managed to establish himself as the centre of this contributory knowledge-making process. Given the exponential growth in the number of known species and the resulting need for observation, this was the necessary condition which allowed him continuously to update and correct his systematic works, and allowed them to maintain their status as the central catalogues of a global botany for decades.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-569
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of Science
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Scopus Subject Areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Contribution and co-production: The collaborative culture of linnaean botany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this