TY - JOUR
T1 - Content Specialists’ Anti-Plagiarism Pedagogical Interventions: A Thematic Review
AU - Li, Yongyan
AU - Chen, Hui
AU - Liu, Xiaoling
AU - Wang, Simon
N1 - The study reported in this paper was partly financed by a Seed Fund for PI Research (University of Hong Kong) and a Faculty Research Fund (Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12/28
Y1 - 2024/12/28
N2 - This paper presents a thematic review of the anti-plagiarism instruction of content specialists as reported in a range of articles published in the decade of 2014–2023. A total of 28 articles were identified through systematic searching and a ChatGPT-assisted selection process based on a set of inclusion criteria. Specifically, we aimed to include those articles that contain sufficient details of the instructional procedure as well as an evidence-based report of the effectiveness of the pedagogical intervention. A coding scheme of two dimensions (“Rationales for the pedagogical interventions” and “Characteristics of the pedagogical interventions”) provided a framework for our analysis of the focal literature. By focusing on content teachers’, as opposed to language teachers’, pedagogical practices in addressing the issue of plagiarism in varied geographical and institutional contexts, this review study provides insights for both content and language specialists to draw upon and will serve to raise awareness for the value of collaboration between content and language teachers in handling academic literacy issues such as plagiarism.
AB - This paper presents a thematic review of the anti-plagiarism instruction of content specialists as reported in a range of articles published in the decade of 2014–2023. A total of 28 articles were identified through systematic searching and a ChatGPT-assisted selection process based on a set of inclusion criteria. Specifically, we aimed to include those articles that contain sufficient details of the instructional procedure as well as an evidence-based report of the effectiveness of the pedagogical intervention. A coding scheme of two dimensions (“Rationales for the pedagogical interventions” and “Characteristics of the pedagogical interventions”) provided a framework for our analysis of the focal literature. By focusing on content teachers’, as opposed to language teachers’, pedagogical practices in addressing the issue of plagiarism in varied geographical and institutional contexts, this review study provides insights for both content and language specialists to draw upon and will serve to raise awareness for the value of collaboration between content and language teachers in handling academic literacy issues such as plagiarism.
KW - Content specialists
KW - Generative AI-empowered literature screening
KW - Interdisciplinary collaboration
KW - Plagiarism
KW - Plagiarism intervention
KW - Thematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213507481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-024-09589-6#rightslink
U2 - 10.1007/s10805-024-09589-6
DO - 10.1007/s10805-024-09589-6
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85213507481
SN - 1570-1727
JO - Journal of Academic Ethics
JF - Journal of Academic Ethics
ER -