Conspiracy Theories, Their Critical Value, and the Limits of Factchecking: Climate Change Documentaries

Kenneth Paul Tan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Factchecking is often regarded as a vital part of holistic efforts to address the problem of misinformation, disinformation, and fake news, particularly in this social media age. But what are the limits of factchecking when it comes to conspiracy theories, particularly when conspiracy theories are the subject of popular documentaries? This chapter reflects on this question by focusing on conspiracy theory films about climate change and by explaining conspiracy theories in terms of broad socio-political tensions between the excesses of neoliberal globalization and the rise of authoritarian populism as a reaction to this. The chapter cautions against the indiscriminate and politically motivated use of “conspiracy theories” as a label to diminish critical thinking and political, moral, and aesthetic imagination.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChecking the Fact-Checkers
Subtitle of host publicationAn International Perspective
EditorsCeline Yunya Song, Drew Margolin, Daya K. Thussu
PublisherRoutledge
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jun 2024

User-Defined Keywords

  • Conspiracy theories
  • Conspiracy theorists
  • Climate change
  • Popular documentaries
  • Neoliberal globalization
  • Authoritarian populism
  • Critical thinking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiracy Theories, Their Critical Value, and the Limits of Factchecking: Climate Change Documentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this