Abstract
This chapter explores the consequences of exposure to debunked yet popularly circulated COVID-19 misinformation on social media in the four studied cities. Specifically, it investigates how encountering the misinformation elicits respondents’ negative emotions (e.g., anger and anxiety) and influences their risk perception for both themselves and others. Findings show that the greater the levels of exposure to, sharing of, and elaboration of misinformation, the stronger the negative emotions and biased perception of others as being influenced by the misinformation. Thinking about the harmful consequences of misinformation pushed the level of anger, anxiety, annoyance, and worry to a higher notch. Beijing respondents who were exposed to COVID-19 misinformation the most reported the highest level of negative emotions and biased perception, followed by those from Singapore, Taipei, and Hong Kong.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Miscommunicating the COVID-19 Pandemic |
| Subtitle of host publication | An Asia Perspective |
| Editors | Ran Wei, Dong Dong, Guanxiong Huang, Yi-Hui Christine Huang, Hai Liang, Ven-hwei Lo, Sibo Wang |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Pages | 89-110 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000954685, 9781003355984 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032410470, 9781032408880 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Sept 2023 |
Publication series
| Name | Routledge Advances in Internationalizing Media Studies |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Routledge |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conséquences of exposure to misinformation: Negative emotions and biased risk perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver